Τρίτη 23 Αυγούστου 2011

Friedrich Nietzsche as a leader



Nietzsche is the leader I chose to write about, Friedrich Nietzsche was a philosopher who managed to challenge the foundations of Christianity and traditional morality. He emphasized in life, creativity, health and the realities of the world. He was one of the first existential philosophers and he lived in Germany of the late 19th century. I propose him as a leader because his work and theory has inspired other leading figures such as dancers, poets, novelists, painters, psychologists, philosophers, sociologists and social revolutionaries.
BIOGRAPHY
Nietzsche was born in the small village of Rocken bei Lutzen on October 15, 1844. His father was a protestant scholar and died when Nietzsche was 4 years old, then Nietzsche’s family moved to Nauburg an der Saale and lived with his mother.
At the age of 14 he attended a boarding school which prepared him for university studies. Nietzsche created a literature club called Germania and identified with Wagner’s music. Also as a teenager admired the writings of Friedrich Holderlin ,Jean-Paul Richter and David Strauss (Wicks, 2008).
In 1864 he entered the University of Bonn where he studied theology and philosophy, then his understood that he is interested in philosophy. Nietzsche was inspired by his lecturer Friedrich Wilhelm Ritschl and followed him to the university of Leipzig where he founded his own academic character through his essays on Aristotle, Theognis, Simonides. There he became a friend with Erwin Rohde and later he discovered Arthur Schopenhauer and he was inspired by him  (Wicks, 2008).
Later he met Richard Wagner and shared with him his enthusiasm for Schopenhauer. Their relationship affected Nietzsche deeply. Wagner suggested Nietzsche to work on a position on the classical philosophy at the university of Basel and he began to teach there at the age of 24  (Wicks, 2008).
Nietzsche’s admiration for Schopenhauer and his frustration with the German culture forced him to write his first book called ‘The birth of tragedy’ in 1872. In 1877 he wrote another book called ‘On the origin of moral feelings’ and during this period he finished his studies on contemporary German culture (Unfashionable observations). In 1878, at the end of his university career he wrote the book ‘Human, all-too human’ which introduced his philosophical style. That time his health was worsened as an effect of an injury in the military service that led to headaches, eyesight problems and vomiting. These problems led him to leave the university at age 34   (Wicks, 2008).
From 1880 until 1889 when he collapsed he lived a gypsy like life. In 1882 he visited Rome where he met Lou von Salome, a Russian girl who was studying philosophy and theology in Zurich. He felt in love with her and he asked her to marry him, she declined and moved to Berlin where she worked with Sigmund Freud. This period inspired Nietzsche to write most of his books which were the following: Daybreak (1881), The gay science (1882-87), Thus spoke Zarathustra (1883-85), Beyond good and evil (1886), On the genealogy of morals (1887), The case of Wagner (1888), Twilight of idols (1888), The antichrist (1888), Ecce Homo (1888) and Nietzsche Contra Wagner (1888)  (Wicks, 2008).
On 1889 Nietzsche experienced a mental breakdown which left him incapable for the rest of his life. Some assumed that he was afflicted by a syphilitic infection, other argue that he was using a drug called chloral hydrate as a sedative, other claim that he has an inherited brain disease. The exact cause of his collapse remains unclear. On August 25, 1900 Nietzsche died from pneumonia in combination with a stroke at the age of 56.  (Wicks, 2008).
Nietzsche’s theory
Nietzsche believed that human nature is divided in two major parts, the apollonian and the Dionysian part. The apollonian side of the human nature is considered to be the logical side, our desire for a peaceful life, stability. The Dionysian side of the human nature represents the illogical component of the psyche, the attraction towards the creative chaos, passion and dynamic experiences. Art and literature represent release these two tendencies. Nietzsche believed that failures that result fro taking risks may reinforce the personal development. This theory is very similar to the Freud’s theory that talks about personality structure and divides personality in three components the id which reflects the Dionysian side of the human nature, the ego which reflects the apollonian side and ego, a new component created by Freud and reflects the moral side of the human personality  (Heirgenhaun 2005),.
Nietzsche considered his self as a psychologist, he believed that each person is a unique miracle. He suggested that we are responsible toward ourselves for our existence and our liberty makes us responsible for our personality in the same way artists are responsible for their creations (Heirgenhaun 2005) .
Nietzsche announced that God is dead. Philosophers and scientists killed him. Philosophers and scientists killed God and destroyed universe’s purpose. Darwinian theory for example showed that people have the same origin with other living organisms and have the same destiny which is death. Also astronomy suggests that earth has no special position in the universe, it is a planet of a small size that turns around of the sun and there are millions suns in the universe(Heirgenhaun 2005) .
Nietzsche suggested that there is no God who cares about us and without religion humans are alone in a universal tabula rasa without supernatural principles and powers to drive them(Heirgenhaun 2005) .
Nietzsche believed that people have to gain knowledge about them and act according to this knowledge. The most important human motive is the desire for power. Like Schopenhauer, Neitzsche believed that people are mainly illogical. He believed that insticts should not be repressed but they have to be expressed. The desire for power can be satisfied only when a human being acts according to her feelings. Agains this theory reflects Freud’s theory, Freud believed that people are savage beasts motivated by insticts, insticts should be expressed otherwise the person will be supressed and unhappy (Heirgenhaun 2005).
The desire for power is to gain governance over ourselves and our destiny. The desire for power makes humans to search for new experiences and move towards their full potential. People that move towards their full potential are considered to be supermen because morality does not govern their life, their life is independent and creative. Neitzsche believed that Jesus, Dostojevsky and Goethe were supermen.
Nazi’s borrowed the theory of Neitzsche and they believed that German were supermen. For Nazi’s supermen was synonymous to superior people. Neitzsche did not believed that there are nations that are superior or inferior, he ended his relationship with Wagner because he had very intense nationalistic views. According to Nietzsche every person has the ability to become a superman. Only passion self knowledge and courage differentiate men for supermen. Freud suggested that Neitzsche should have included himself in the catalogues of the supermen because he had an extremely filtering knowledge about himself (Heirgenhaun 2005) .

Nietzsche as a leader
I believe that the trait approach is the approach that fits to Friedrich Nietzsche ‘s case. This approach is also called ‘’the great man’’ approach as it emphasizes on the innate qualities that characterize the leading figures. This approach identifies some leadership traits such as intelligence, self-confidence, determination, integrity and sociability. The trait approach includes only the leader and not other people or the situation. I assume that Nietzsche had the appropriate traits to do what he did, to develop his theory and write all these books. Off course he was influenced by other people such as Wagner and Schopenhauer but if he was not born with all these personality traits that led him to become a great philosopher he could not managed to reach that point. Nietzsche influenced many other leading figures especially in psychology, his theories were used as a basis for later theories to be developed or inspired future theorists to develop their own theories.
Freud was the first person that was influenced from Neizsche, another well-known psychologist that was influenced too by this bright mind was Alfred Adler. Carl Jung was another famous theorist who was influenced by Neitsche. Jung believed that people are either introverted ot extroverted. He believed that introverted people are governed by the apollonian tendency of the human nature and extroverted are governed by the dionysian tendency (Heirgenhaun 2005).
Neitzsche is considered to be either an existential philosopher or romantic philosopher. The topics of both philosophies focus on human feelings, the importance of subjective experience, the respect towards individuality and a reaction towards the theories of rationalists, empricalists and physical scientists. He believed that these theories eliminate the importance of the human being. Romantism and Existentialism have shaped the third power of Psychology which is called Humanistic psychology. Rogers, Maslow, May and Kelly were some of the theorists influenced by romantic and existential philosophy (Heirgenhaun 2005) .



‘‘The mind-body problem is a pseudobroblem and it is of no inerest for psychologists’’ Discuss what is the nature of the ind-body problem and why would anyone claim tha above about it? Do you agree with any parts of the claim and why? If you think that the mind body debate does concern psychologist, what view would you see yourself attracted to? Can you justify your view and explain why in your opinion, it can provide us with the best solution to the problem?


                                              Introduction
Most of us have thought of this problem, it is when we are sad or stressed and our bodies become ill, I have experienced many situations when my body has followed my mind’s mood and emotions. Descartes, the famous philosopher of the middle ages said, I think therefore I am. This can be explained by different ways, my explanation is that I think therefore I exist, existence without the mind or its interaction with the apparent material world cannot be perceived.
                                        Presentation of theory
                                      What is mind-body problem?
Mind-body problem is the question if there is mind or soul and if there is how interacts with the body. The mind-body problem has concerned humans throughout centuries; it is as old as psychology. Every psychologist has to see to this problem directly or indirectly. There are many different theories which manipulate this problem; some of them are materialism, monism, dualism, idealism, the theory of emergentism, epiphenomenalism, double aspectism, occationalism, psychophysical parallelism and preestablished harmony (Hergenhahn,2005).
                                                   Materialism
Some psychologists try to explain everything in a materialistic way, the mental and intellectual events can be explained by the principles of physics and chemistry. These psychologists are called materialists because they believe that the matter is the only substance that surrounds us. Consequently everything in the world including the behavior of human beings can be explained by natural sciences(Hergenhahn,2005).

                                                    Monism
Monists are those who support the idea that there is only one reality. Materialists are monists because they believe that there is only matter. Idealists are monists too because they consider that everything including the material world is a result of the human consciousness(Hergenhahn,2005).
                                               Dualism
Dualists suggest that there are two sides in humans, the material and the mental side, dualists consider that there are material events and mental  events. There are several types of dualism: interactionalism, emergentism, epiphenomenalism, double aspectism, psychophysical parallelism, preestablished harmony and occasionalism(Hergenhahn,2005).
                                          Interactionalism
This theory suggests that the mind and the body interact between them. The mind influences the body. According to this view, the mind is able to cause behaviors and actions. This theory was developed by Descartes and it is the only theory that support the members of the humanistic-existential school. The psychoanalysts like Freud are also supporters of this theory of interactionalism as they consider that the illnesses of the body are caused by mindful episodes like conflicts, anxiety and cancelation(Hergenhahn,2005).
                                                  Emergentism
This theory supports the idea that the conditions of the mind come from the brain, this theory is very popular nowadays.  There is one type of emergentism which is related to interactionalism and suggests that the mindful activities can influence the activity of the brain and cause behaviors. There is another type of emergentism which is called epiphenomenalism(Hergenhahn,2005).
                                         Epiphenomenalism
This theory suggests that the brain causes the mental events, however the mental events are not able to cause behaviors. According to this approach the mental events are by-products of the brain, however they have nothing to do with behaviors (Hergenhahn,2005).
                                       Psychophysical parallelism
This theory considers that an environmental experience is able to cause mental events and bodily responses at the same time. Psychophysical parallelism suggests that these two events take place independently (Hergenhahn,2005).
                                              Double aspectism
Double aspectism is another dualistic view which suggests that the individual cannot be divided into mind and body but it consists of a unity which experiences bodily and mental events at the same time. The bodily and mental events are the two sides of human being. According to this view the body and the mind cannot interact, they are simply two sides of each event we experience as humans (Hergenhahn,2005).
                                        Preestablished harmony
This dualistic theory considers that mental and bodily events are different types of events; however they are synchronized because they are designed to follow similar directions. It is considered that this coordination is prearranged by an external factor e.g. God(Hergenhahn,2005).
                                        Occasionalism
Occasionalism is the belief that the relation between the mind and the body is arranged by the mediation of God. This theory was introduced by Nicolas de Malebrance (1638-1715) who suggested that when a desire  is appeared, God mobilizes the body to take action, similarly when something happens to the body, God cause a similar mental experience(Hergenhahn,2005).
                                      Discussion
My personal opinion is that psychology has to do with the interaction of the body and mind, psychology is a science of the mind, it explores issues which their main source is the mind. I believe in interactionalism which suggests that the mind and the body exist and interact together. However  I believe that our soul is the original source of our existence, a view that is closer to idealism which is a monistic theory.
In an article about materialism and reflections of faith, Feredino (2007) suggested that if we accept materialism, we will see that it cannot be proved by the natural sciences which examine the material world. The problems which come from materialism like the absence of an eternal soul, the refusal of the God and the beyond lead humans to a mental and psychological impasse because humans have an internal impulse to search for the eternal and their future in the eternity.
We have conscience of our existence, of the existence of the objective world, we perceive that we have personality, however the personality, the thoughts, the will are not properties of the matter, we need a cause which has these properties and this cause cannot be the matter. The search for the cause of the existence of the world, of the life, of the mind lead to the admission that materialism is not sufficient explanation of the world(Feredino 2007).
If we observe human, we will see that he has not only appetites and passions, he has perception of the right and wrong, of the good and bad. Μoral nature of humans cannot be considered as product of matter which off course  has not such properties(Feredino,2007).
Like morality, the will is one fundamental mental force which is one more properties that we do not meet in the material world. Some scientists suggested that the matter of the microcosm show that initiative of movement exists in the material particles too. However these suggestions are not enough to persuade humans that the matter has will(Feredino,2007).
In many cases we observe the idea of  the beauty. Humans search for the beautiful developing fine arts, the art of music, of speech, of painting. The desire and the search for the beautiful cannot be material.
But how psychology is related to a mental world? There are several psychological approaches which emphasize on this side of humans. Humanism for example suggests that the goal of life is to reach our potential in order to live more fully our lives. In the other hand Jungian psychology supports the idea that there are archetypes in the human collective unconscious which consist of memories from the humanistic racial history, Jungian psychology is considered to be closer to mysticismFeredino,2007).
A modern psychiatrist whose name is Bryan Weiss suggests that  the world is energy ,for example  nuclear bombs are based on the techniques of transformation of energy and the traditional therapies function because of the transformation of energy that take place in cellular level.  He supports the idea that our souls are attracted to love because it is an energy which surrounds everything. He claims that love has a therapeutic property which is able to transform our souls, our mind, our bodies and exceed pain and illness(Weiss,2005).   
Bryan Weiss suggests that the body is a simple institution of those of us  who live here, he believes that they are various levels of conscience which are visited by our souls  after leaving our bodies. According to this theory we pass through various stages of development and the goal of these processes is to learn because everything is a continuous development ( Weiss,2005).
                              Conclusion
There are numerous theories suggesting everything somebody can image, what to believe or not is a personal choice of each of us. In my view is very pessimistic to think that life is only matter and that the mind is a chemical reaction of the brain which brain in turn is only matter, I believe that human mind is a spiritual force designed to be developed and improved, we can see this impulse in the development of sciences, arts, philosophy, psychology and technology.I think that this impulse of progress could not be material or explained by natural science.







                               References:
Feredino, G(2005, July 23). Materialism, source: the reflections of    faith.Orthodoxe team of dogmatic research [Online], (pp.1-5) Available:http://www.oodegr.com/oode/a8eismos/ylismos1.htm
Hergenhahn B.R.  Introduction to the History of Psychology.(pp.19-31) Livani: Athens
Weiss, B. (2005) Messages from the teacher: experiencing the power of love.(pp.15-22)Kastaniotis: Athens

Ethnocentrism, stereotypes and prejudice “Toys guns and real fears-it’s playtime in Gaza”


Ethnocentrism, stereotypes and prejudice “Toys guns and real fears-it’s playtime in Gaza”

Nowadays social problems are the real problems, people’s relationships and social environment affect their beliefs and perceptions, and this means that all individuals are affected by the rules and norms of the society in which they live. Social processes such as ethnocentrism, stereotyping and prejudice influence to one degree or another every member of the society. In this paper we will define the three processes and use as example of them an article on Times titled “Toys guns and real fears-it’s playtime in Gaza”.
  Ethnocentrism, stereotypes and prejudice are defined by social psychology but do we need and exact definition?
The reality is that we know these processes, all of us we have seen them many times, how many times we have thought that other groups are inferior of us e.g. Greek people believe that Albanian people are inferior and dirty ,how many times we like more a person who has a bmw car because this means he or she is rich or we dislike a person because he or she is from Turkey because many years ago Greeks and Turkish were in a war?
These processes have long and universal history, white American disliked African-Americans, many neighborhood and schools stay separate and unequal, Arabs dislike Jews, Nazis believed that they were so much superior than others that killed Jews and made the other tribes work for them, France refused to take part to the war of Iraq supporting America’s military and an anti-French anger was created, Indians( native American) were denigrated by whites ,and women by men, The Chinese word for China means “the center of the world”, also American people in 1977 believed that homosexuals should not be allowed to work in the army, works as teachers, doctor and clergy, by 2003 the percentages have changed, people are showed to be less prejudiced (American Enterprise Institute, 2004),(Carole Wade & Carol Tavris, 2008).
In times of war, people are unable to avoid emotional reasoning about the enemy. They believe that the enemies are the aggressors who are creatures less than human, words such as pests, dogs or pigs have been used for them. After 9/11 anti-American demonstrators in Jakarta portrayed George Bush as a radical dog, and an American cartoonist lumped Arab Muslims and nations into a tub of pests (Carole Wade & Carol Tavris, 2008).
 All these examples are from real life, how these processes are found around the world, and examples of conflicts which have been created between groups, cultures and nations. How social psychology does defines these processes, what is exactly ethnocentrism, stereotype and prejudice? What does it mean to be prejudiced?
People are grouped into nations, religions, cultures, societies but sometimes it leads to ethnocentrism which is the idea that one’s own ethnic group, nation or religion is superior too all others. Ethnocentrism rests an essential social identity: us, on the other hand they distinguish everybody else as “not-us” or “them”, us-them social identities are strengthened especially when two groups vie with each other (Carole Wade & Carol Tavris, 2008).
Ethnocentrism has a negative meaning and this term is considered to be proportional of the term egocentrism. It is a system of thoughts which refers to the stable tendency of a person or a group or a society to adapt only social phenomena which are very familiar to them. In an unconscious way a member of a society prefers the already known models of his or her society to criticize the other societies. This phenomenon of ethnocentrism is based on the overestimate of a nation to which we belong and the underestimate of the other nations. These tendencies are found more often to psychologically disturbed people or to people out of law or to persons who generally are considered suspect(Papadopoulos 2005).
 Stereotype is a summary idea of a group of people in which all members of the group are viewed as sharing a familiar characteristic. Stereotypes are called tools by the psychological science because they have disadvantages but they have also advantages as they imitate actual differences among people, help us process new information and get back memories, guess people’s behaviors. The disadvantages are that they exaggerate differences between groups making stereotyped group  seem unknown and unsafe, they produce selective perception people have a tendency to see only the evidence that fits the stereotype and finally produce the idea that all members of other groups are the equal ( Carole Wade & Carol Tavris 2008). The negative meaning is related to racism and nationalistic positions and opinions are followed by intense and reciprocal negative feelings. The negative traits which are given to the others are common in many points, this means that stereotypes were created by historic causes and simply they are reproduced e.g. the stereotype of impious of Muslims for Christian and the opposite(.Papadopoulos 2005).

The third process we are going to define is prejudice and refer to four indirect ways of measuring prejudice.
Prejudice consists of a vigorous, irrational detest or hatred of a group based on a negative stereotype. Unfortunately prejudice does not concern only two groups or specific regions, it is a universal phenomenon and it has a long and universal history because some prejudice rise and fall with events e.g. after 9//11 many American people had anti-Arab feelings, as we mentioned above an American cartoonist lumped Muslims and Arabs into a barrel of pests.
 Sometimes prejudice is not visible because it is unconscious and implicit, so social psychology has developed four indirect ways of measuring this kind of prejudice.
The first way is the measures of symbolic racism which is when general feelings for a group may be positive or neutral but these feelings are not hostile and belong to surface attitudes e.g. The same Greeks who will say that they do not dislike foreigners might agree that “foreigners in Greece are getting too demanding in their push for equal rights”.
The second way is the measures of behavior, social psychologists and researchers study how people behave when they are found with a probable object of prejudice.
e.g.in a public room sit or stand farther away than they normally would or present other signs of discomfort.
The third way of measuring prejudice is the measures of physiological changes in the brain, social neuroscience consists of a new science which study the brain during social processes, including prejudice e.g. Activity in the amygdala is a structure of the brain realted to fear and negative emotion and it is elevated when somebody sees a picture or hears about the other group to which he is prejudiced.
The last way of measuring prejudice is based on assumption tha people are unaware of and it is called measures of unconscious associations. A test named IAT (implicit associations test) was found to measure associations between a stimulus and unconscious feelings of repulsiveness or pleasantness (Carole Wade & Carol Tavris 2008).
Prejudiced people do not feel prejudiced, they use logic and opposite  arguments and return to their prejudices with obviously accepted arguments. Prejudices are often followed by partiality, bias and falsification either consciously or unconsciously(Papadopoulos 2005).

 We will use as example of the three processes a recent article from the Times  on 21 December 2007 which refers to a social problem.
December 21, 2007
Toy guns and real fears - it's playtime in Gaza
Sheera Frenkel in Bethlehem
The guns may be made of plastic, but the scenes played out by these Palestinian children look real enough.
In war-torn Gaza and the West Bank, boys mimic the daily violence that takes place in their neighbourhoods. Using toy guns given to them during Eid al-Adha, a festival that commemorates the end of the haj, they re-create the conflict that has forged the lives of their fathers and their grandfathers.
Brandishing toy guns, they conduct mock raids of homes, where they pull one another out of the house blindfolded or handcuffed. They also play at “checkpoint”, forcing one another to line up and answer questions as though they were crossing one of the Israeli checkpoints.
Palestinian child protection groups say that children in the West Bank and Gaza are scarred emotionally by the violence. “My son sees other men in his family humiliated by Israeli soldiers. He mimics the behaviour with his friends. I do not think this is healthy,” said Suheir Bahour, 31, of Bethlehem.

This article show us the effect of the battles in the region on children, Gaza is a real example of ethnocentrism, stereotypes and prejudice.
. Gaza is considered a place of conflict between groups, it is a coastal strip of land along the Mediterranean Sea, bordering Egypt and Israel. The region takes its name from Gaza,its most important city. It has about 1.4 million inhabitants mostly Palestinians.
The Strip itself and its population nominally governed by the Palestinian National Authority, though following the June 2007 battle of Gaza, actual control is in the hands of the de facto government dominant by Hamas. Israel controls the strip’s airspace and offshore maritime access. The Gaza Strip is not at this time recognized internationally as part of any sovereign country(www.wikipedia.org).
In this place people die every day, the main reason is because Palestinians and Israeli want to govern the region but ethnocentrism, stereotypes and prejudice are very obvious too between the two nations.
Gaza was a region of battle due to its excellent geographic position, Egyptians, Ottoman and British have also occupy this region and as we said above battles are the main reason which creates and reinforces the feelings of .ethnocentrism, stereotypes and prejudice.
Unfortunately children in Gaza imitate what they see and live, their games are the repetition of the images of violence that they saw yesterday or last week, guns, soldiers, killings and blood. These children are not only prejudiced against Jews, thinking that Palestinians are superior but also fight against them imitating adults.




How to reduce such phenomena

Ethnocentrism, stereotypes and prejudice are related to the absolutist theory which requires one culture to be superior to all others. However most cultures and societies have the same basic values; they only differ in their expression of these values.
The basic arguments which refer to the reason why something would be right fore one culture but wrong for another can really be simplified to situation ethics (Lia Watkins, 2002).
As societies  have the same values, it would help to reduce conflicts between different culture by understanding them, cultural sensitivity would be a tool so as to reduce enthocentrism, stereotypes and prejudice.
Cultural sensitivity is the ability to be open up to learning about and accepting of different cultural groups (Texas Commission on alcohol and drug abuse).
Unfortunately there are many causes of these group processes: personality, social and structural. This means that the solutions are varied.
Education  is similar to persuasive communication  so it could help to persuade ethnocentric , prejudiced and stereotyped people, it could be also very successful to be used to prevent people, specially children from these negative group processes. However education’s purpose is to impart information and not to change attitudes.
Some disadvantages of this solution is that the most prejudiced people probably do not take courses which are designed to decrease ethnocentrism and prejudice. Also education would be beneficial in reducing prejudice when it is not very intense and personality disorders are not dominant. On the other hand if somebody is prejudiced due to social learning, education would be successful.
Another solution could be intergroup contact which appears more effective than education. This contact receives support in public housing projects  where people live together. It could be also found in the army. Finally school desegregation is related to decreasing the three group processes.
Sherif ‘s ‘’Robber’s Cave” experiment proves this argument. He separated a group of boys attending scout camp into two groups and after that he placed the groups in competing situations. Ultimately the two groups became very antagonistic  toward its other (Carole Wade & Carol Tavris 2008).
Other solutions could be simulation exercises and therapy.
Simulation exercise devises a situation where people who don’t normally experience prejudice and discrimination, experience them. They learn about the feeling that made them experience these them and they see by this direct method the pointlessness of these processes.
Therapy could be successful for people who suffer from personality problems, when the other solution we mentioned above are not effective. Then therapy resolves the problem that caused people to be discriminatory and convince intolerant people that these group processes are not the right attitudes that help to trade with someone’s insecurities or evils (www.delmar.edu)

Social psychology showed us  how ethnocentrism, prejudice and stereotypes work in the societies, why and how they have been created but it would be very helpful to find more ways so as to reduce such phenomena, also governments should do the same, help people avoid being discriminatory in order to facilitate people’s lives. Unfortunately many countries have not the right governments which would help their citizens, that is the reason why these countries suffer the most by discrimination. Israeli and Palestinians belong to them; their governors make them more fanatic and discriminatory making the social problems worse.

FUNCTIONALISM & STRUCTURALISM

                         FUNCTIONALISM AND STRUCTURALISM


Introduction
Psychology as science has passed through many developmental stages, many theories and schools have been created and disappeared, and however most of them have influenced what is called today psychology. Structuralism and Functionalism were two very influential schools. The work of Wilhelm Maximilian Wundt in Structuralism and Voluntarism, the work of Edward Bradford Titchener in Structuralism and the work of William James in Functionalism are significant and determinant of later developments in psychology. In this paper I will summarize the main tenets and differences of these schools and I will suggest why structuralism draws my support.
Presentation of theory
Wundt’s theory
William Wundt viewed psychology as an experimental science, Wundt founded first Voluntarism in 1890 which was later confused with Structuralism. The concept of voluntarism was used because he believed that voluntarism is a vital concept that has to be examined in order to understand all psychological problems. Psychology is an experimental science, however experiments can be used only for the basic functions of the mind and not for higher mental functions. Higher mental functions can be studied only through various types of naturalistic observation. Furthermore he divided experience in immediate and mediate experience and he suggested that psychology is the only science that examines immediate experience(Hergenhahn,2005).
According to Wundt psychology’s goals are the following:
The discovery of the fundamental elements of thought and the discovery of the laws through which mental elements are combined creating more multifaceted mental experiences (Hergenhahn,2005).
Furthermore Wundt used introspection in order to study the basic mental functions that take part in the active experience. However introspection for Wundt couldn’t be used for the study of higher mental functions. Wundt also divided experience into two types: sensations and feelings. Sensation is produced by the stimulation of a sense organ and can be described by modality and intensity and then it can be analyzed into its further qualities. He suggested that sensation are accompanied by feelings, he suggested the tridimensional theory of feeling according to which feelings can be described by pleasantness-unpleasantness, excitement-calm and strain-relaxation. Wundt showed perception as a result of sensation and feelings which depends on the physical stimulation, the anatomical makeup of the person and the person’s previous experiences. The phenomenon of paying attention to elements voluntarily was called apperception and when these elements are modified at will, the phenomenon was called creative synthesis(Hergenhahn,2005).
Wudnt believed that psychological and physical causation were different because the physical events can be understood  according to previous condition whereas psychological could not. He also used certain principles such as the principle of the heterogeny of ends which suggests that an activity that is directed towards one goal rarely achieves this goal and nothing also, the principle of contrasts according to which suggests that opposite experiences intensify one another and the principle toward the development of opposites which suggests that after intense experience of one time, people tend to desire to experience its opposite(Hergenhahn,2005).
Titchener’s theory
Structuralism was identified by Titchener and confused with voluntarism as being the same thing. However, where Wundt sought to explain conscious
experience in terms of unobservable cognitive
processes, Titchener was interested only in describing conscious processes.
Titchener wanted to describe the structure of the mind, by introspection he tried to search for the elemental ingredients of an experience. He concluded that elemental processes of consciousness consist of sensations, images and affections.  Titchener rejected Wundt’s apperception & creative synthesis, focusing on associationism.Voluntarism can be met in modern psychology however structuralism failed to survive largely because of its untrustworthy use of introspection, its ignorance on developments in other sciences and its failure to assimilate the doctrine of evolution(Hergenhahn,2005).

Functionalism
William James was the psychologist who founded functionalism. He  suggested the concept of stream of consciousness which proposes that consciousness is personal constantly changing, selective and functional. By this suggestion he opposed to the theory of the elements of thought. William James also suggested that instincts govern much human behavior however such behavior can be modified. He suggested habits as repeated activities which are learned. James talked about self, self-esteem and self as knower. James suggested that perceptions subsequently cause action, he claimed that perceptions first cause reactions and these are then experienced as emotions. Moreover his believed in the free will, according to his ideo-motor theory of behavior the action occurs because of an idea in other words ideas of actions most of the time lead to specific behaviors. Finally he talked about pragmatism; he suggested that beliefs, thoughts, and behaviors have to be considered according to their consequences. James’ theories managed to incorporate evolutionary theory in psychology and helped the development of applied psychology (Hergenhahn,2005)..

In theory, structuralism and functionalism had similarities. The most evident connection is that they both concentrated in the mental functions; after all functionalism was shaped as a response to the wounds of structuralism. Additionally, both used introspection as a technique to investigate their ideas. finally, both structuralism and functionalism had the common goal for psychology to turn out to be scientific.
At the same time there were some differences between these two schools of psychology, there were certainly more differences in the two.  Functionalism developed, to a certain amount, as a response against structuralism. It was considered that psychological functions could be best understood in relation to their function rather than their structure. In other words, structuralism studied what happens when an individual does something, and functionalism studied how and why. Functionalism developed according to evolutionary theory when structuralism focused on modeling psychological procedures on the grouping of mental elements. Behaviorism dealt with visible behavior as a consequence of external stimuli. This process was against the study of internal mental process which discarded introspection and looked for a more scientific method.
Structuralism did not survive  and soon disappeared . The experimental methods used in structuralism would not be able to co-exist with today’s standards; the experiments were too biased and the outcomes were therefore invalid . Functionalism focused on the function, or purposes, of behavior and soon moved out as a separate school because it lacked the kind of precision needed to smooth the progress of its theory. Although it’s vanishing as a separate school of psychology “functionalism never really died, it became part of the mainstream psychology” (Oxford Companion, 2006). The meaning of looking at process rather than structure is an ordinary feature of contemporary psychology. As an individual approach it lacked a comprehensible formulation and inherited problems from the structuralism dependence on introspection, nevertheless the theory of functionalism is still alive today (Structuralism vs. Functionalism).

Discussion
I believe that functionalism is far better school than structuralism as it is more flexible and scientific in nature. I support the idea that consciousness has to be studied as a whole and that sciences of other field can help to do so. The assumption that instincts govern behavior however they can be modified remind the theory of psychoanalysis that suggest that id’s drives govern behavior but they are modified by the functions of ego and superego. The use of introspection in structuralism is definitely an unreliable form of studying conscience, I believe that consciousness is a too complex subject that cannot be explained in such a way. Finally the fact that functionalism can be found in contemporary psychology is the evidence that strengthens the fact that structuralism’s assumptions were invalid . There have been schools and applications of psychology which emerged from functionalism, some of them are developmental psychology, clinical psychology, psychological testing, industrial or vocational psychology. Moreover functionalism used as a basis for behaviorism to develop (Green, 2009).
Conclusion
Wundt, Titchener and James made the first steps in the development of psychology; Wundt specially created the first school of psychology. His contributions although they were confused with structuralism and fought by functionalism served psychology to be developed and consciousness to be studied scientifically. Structuralism on the other hand failed to survive as its emphasis on the structure did not satisfied the needs of human being to solve problems. On the other hand functionalism was closer to these needs and managed not only to survive but to serve as a basis for later developments.